The
following is my review of Batman v
Superman: Dawn of Justice. The short
version is, “Holy Cow! I can’t believe I
just saw the movie that I saw.” And for
those who hated the movie, what is wrong with you people? Have you ever read a bloody comic? Go to a comics shop, grab one of the “essentials”
guides and read through those and then go back and rewatch this film. I actually suspected I would not like this
film, but I loved it. I should forewarn
you, there will be MASSIVE spoilers ahead because I can’t properly discuss why
this film was so good without giving elements of the story away, so with that
said, stop now if you haven’t seen the movie yet.
And
now for those still here, we can get into a bit more detail. The thing that worked most for me is that
this was a story. A big problem the
film suffered from was that people went in with a lot of preconceptions about what
the film was and what it wasn’t. The
story component of super hero films has taken a backseat in the last few
years. The films coming out lately are
character driven more than story driven.
When we meet these characters, we don’t know them well enough for that
to be the driving factor. Yet, an entire
world was unfolded right before my eyes.
A rich world filled with fantastic and also flawed characters. And to my amazement it was a world that I believed
in from the second we saw Bruce driving through Metropolis.
This
movie wasn’t made for people who can’t appreciate the artistry of comic books,
and I think that is responsible for some of its backlash. Moreover, there is a lot of fan service here
that means those of us who read comics will walk out knowing a lot more than
those who don’t. Throughout the film,
Bruce experiences dream sequences or perhaps they were visions. Some are myths that maybe he has told himself
like the story of rising to the light. Others
are his worst fears realized, where we see nods to stories like Injustice. Still others I suspect we will have to wait
to fully understand, like the Flash appearing in a cloud of lightning to give
Bruce a clue that will ultimately save them all is straight from the pages of Crisis on Infinite Earths but has
nothing to do with the story at this point.
We
get hints of what is to come, and much as I was excited for the Avengers, I am now very much looking
forward to Justice League, a film I
was rather ambivalent toward up to this point.
And if it delivers in the same way that this film did we have a lot to
look forward to for a long time to come.
This film had a number of nods and a lot of influences that were taken
straight from the comic pages. They
range from little things like Bruce standing at the computer in full costume
just without the cowl to larger elements like Luthor not trusting Superman
because he doesn’t believe that he can be that powerful and also that virtuous.
This
film is one chapter in a story that is being told. This is not a stand-alone movie that then
ties into a larger team-up film. That’s
the marvelous competition for the super hero market you’re looking for. This is one chapter of a single story. And for that reason it also might feel like a
miss to some people From the above
mentioned appearance of the Flash to the showcasing of Parademons to a giant Ω on the ground in
another of Bruce’s visions, there is a much larger game afoot. My preference for a storyteller other than David
Goyer aside, they are foreshadowing things that aren’t going to pay off for a
number of films. As such, the viewer who
doesn’t know what these symbols mean is likely to feel things are much more
disjointed than they actually are.
Then there is Leonard Maltin’s statement “When was it decided superhero movies shouldn't be any fun?” When was it decided that superhero movies had to just be fun? This isn’t a story about fun, this is a story grappling with ideologies and belief systems and the hard concepts of life. In the words of C.S. Lewis ““Since it is so likely that they will meet cruel enemies, let them at least have heard of brave knights and heroic courage. . . Let there be wicked kings and beheadings, battles and dungeons, giants and dragons, and let villains be soundly killed at the end of the book.” Fairy tales are not always fun. Ancient and Medieval literature can be slow and plodding, but entertainment is not always their goal. They were and are tools to teach and demonstrate principles and ideas, and that is the kind of film we have here; one that touches on and questions our ideas regarding justice and legality, good and evil, god and man.
True,
I’m a DC fan. Man of Steel I walked out having thoroughly enjoyed because we
finally got to see Superman cut loose and not be bound by his powers. That doesn’t mean that the film was without
its flaws, but just because a film has a flaw doesn’t mean it’s not a good
film. And flaws can be fixed. The color pallet for Man of Steel was far to stark, here it feels more vibrant, a distinct improvement. But, like its predecessor, Dawn of Justice does have some
flaws. The biggest one for me is Lex
Luthor. I liked Lex and I thought he was
an excellent antagonist. I simply did
not care for the way he was made a modern boy billionaire in this film. I did appreciate that they got to show his
genius on the other hand. This was also
something that was finally restored to the Bat.
Bruce was once again a detective.
The element of Batman that had been missing from the Nolan films,
replaced by gadgets, was restored.
As
glad as I am to see Batman as a detective, I was equally glad to see him as the
master strategist. He orchestrated every
aspect of his fight with Superman from where it started to where it would
end. However, there are some concerns
with this character as well. It is not
that he uses guns. Batman has ALWAYS
used guns of some sort (grappling gun anyone).
There are people who got really upset to see Batman holding a gun in the
trailers. It never ceases to amaze how
quickly people will jump to conclusions in this day and age. There is this thing called context and it
would be nice if we could all start waiting for it before leaping to
conclusions again.
The
gun he was using in the trailers that stirred up so much controversy was a gas
gun. He previously used guns on his Batmobile
and Batwing (1989). In Final Crisis he literally shot Darkseid
with a handgun so it’s not out of character for him to use that sort of weapon. What is out of character is that he seemingly
kills people. I don’t particularly like
this development. However, it’s also
clear that I’ve never seen this Batman before.
We see Bruce 20 years in. He’s
lost a Robin,that much we know. The
mansion has been burned. He’s been
broken and it has made him callous. He
doesn’t kill anyone that isn’t trying to kill him, and even then he kills as
few as possible. When he stops a grenade
from being thrown it hurt fewer people blowing up where it fell than it would
had he thrown it.
However,
Superman ultimately inspires Batman by the end of the film. Bruce emerges from this storm a different and
better man than he was when he sank into it.
Superman ends the film as Superman.
He sacrificed himself for the world, and the woman he loved. And the silver “S” on the black coffin was
beautiful. He threw himself into the
path of Doomsday in order to stop him.
And this was yet another character I feel they adapted him with great
success. I understand that this wasn’t
panel by panel, but it was indeed the spirit of the character. An abomination of Kryptonian science that
gets stronger every time you kill it that Lex is ultimately responsible for…
does it really matter how he was an abomination?
Though
I would have preferred not having the somewhat awkward bathtub scene with
Lois, the character fits in the modern world.
She is the same character we met in Man
of Steel. She is putting her neck on
the line to get stories that no one else will and is able to connect the puzzle
pieces of the bigger picture before anyone else. Gal Gadot gives us a bit of an enigmatic
Wonder Woman. She works in the film but
is not essential to it. Much as she did
in Bruce Timm’s Justice League
cartoon she sort of just drops into the film to save the day. I don’t consider that a valid complaint,
because honestly that is my favorite portrayal of the character, but I would
have liked her to get more fleshed out.
Fortunately, Wonder Woman is
not far from being released. And while I
was concerned about Jeremy Irons as Alfred, I found I loved the way he handled
the role.
So
no, this is not a fun little romp into the world of superheroes. This is an intricate story. The manipulations of Lex are subtle. Truthfully, I was on his side for the first
2/3 of the film, until everything was revealed.
The motivations for the characters are implied. This history is in the background, not at the
forefront of the film. There are easter
eggs scattered throughout that may just be fun nods, but more likely are
foreshadowing events that are years from seeing fruition. This is a comic book movie, not a superhero
movie. If you want to go on a fun little
romp through the land of capes and tights, if you want to see the same story we've seen over and over again of guy becomes hero to stop villain or has to up his game because of new villain, then stay clear. If you want to have an entire world and
mythology built in front of you, then you must see this film.